| Document
11.
Part of Memorandum of the ASAS
“The attitude towards the economic backwardness of Serbia shows that
vindicative policy towards it has not weakened during the time. On the
contrary, feeding itself with its success, it became increasingly powerful
in order to definitely be expressed in genocide. The discrimination of
citizens of Serbia is politically unacceptable, by which, due to the representation
of republics by parity, it is smaller than the representation of others
in positions of officials and federal delegates in the Federal Assembly,
and the vote of Serbian voters is less valid than that of any other republic
or province. In this light, Yugoslavia has not expressed itself as a community
of equal citizens, or of equal nations and nationalities, as a community
of all equal territories. Nevertheless, this equality is not valid for
Serbia due to its special legal-political position that intends to keep
the Serbian people under permanent control. The main idea of such policy
was ‘weak Serbia, strong Yugoslavia', that advanced to an influential opinion:
if Serbia, as the largest nation, were allowed an accelerated economic
development, it would become dangerous to other nations. Therefore, all
the possibilities have been used to put as great limits as possible to
its economic development and political consolidation. One of those very
acute limits is the present undefined position and abundant in internal
constitutional conflicts of Serbia.
By the Constitution of 1974, Serbia in fact was divided into three
parts. The autonomous provinces became equal to republics in every aspect,
they were not defined as states only and do not have the same number of
their representatives in some federal bodies.
...The present fate of Kosova is not ‘complicated' any more, and it
cannot be limited by vain, indirect and skilful estimations, by generalised
platforms - but in short, it is a matter of Yugoslav consequences! Between
the provincial segregation that has become increasingly exclusive and federal
arbitrages, that have only paralysed anything else, often the urgent measures
- an intertwining of unsolved situations is being closed in the circle
of unsolved questions. The fate of Kosova has become the vital question
of the whole Serbian people. If it is not resolved with really right results
of the imposed war, if real security and right equality are not established
for all the peoples living in Kosova, if objective and permanent conditions
are not created for the people who have emigrated to return there - this
part of the Republic of Serbia and Yugoslavia will become a European question,
with heavy and unpredicted consequences. Kosova presents one of the most
important points of the internal Balkans. In conformity with ethnic profile
of the Balkan Peninsula, ethnic mixing in many Balkan territories and the
request for ethnically clean Kosova, that has been practically carried
out, not only is a direct and harsh threat to all the peoples that are
there in minority, but if this comes true, the wave of expansion that has
begun will present a real and daily threat to all the peoples of Yugoslavia.
Kosova is not the only region in which the Serbian population is found
under discrimination pressure. The absolute and not only relative decline
of the number of Serbs in Croatia is a sufficient proof for such confirmation.
According to the census of 1948, 543,795 or 14.48 per cent Serbs were in
Croatia. According to the census of 1981, their number came down to 531,502,
which was 11.5 per cent of the total number of population in Croatia. In
33 years in peace, the number of Serbs in Croatia was reduced, even in
comparison with the post-war period, when the first census was done and
when the consequence of the war to the number of Serbs was known.
Lika, Kordun and Bania remained the most undeveloped regions in Croatia,
what caused the emigration of the Serbs to Serbia, and migrations to other
parts of Croatia, where the Serbs, as a group of newcomers, minor and inferior
in social viewpoint, were subjugated to assimilation. Actually, the Serbian
population in Croatia has been subjected to refined assimilation. A constituent
part of that policy was banning of all Serbian societies and cultural institutions
in Croatia, that had a rich tradition from the time of Austria-Hungarians
and Yugoslavia between the two wars, then forcing an official language
on them, that is called by the name of the second nation (Croatian), personifying
national equality in this way.
The existing depressive situation of the Serbian people, with increasingly
higher occurrence of chauvinism and serbophobia in some environs, was to
the advantage of revival of increasingly drastic appearance of national
feeling of the Serbian population and reactions that could be caused and
be dangerous. Our duty is not to close our eyes and underestimate those
dangers for a single instant...
The reason why the citizens and working class have not been represented
in the respective chambers of the Federal Assembly cannot be ascribed to
favouring the national only, but also to the intention that Serbia should
be put in an unequal position and in this way its political influence become
weaker. But the greatest concern is that the Serbian people does not have
a state, such as all the other peoples have. It is true that in article
1 of the Constitution of the SR of Serbia the provision says that Serbia
is a state, but the question is what kind of state it is that is incompetent
in its own territory and which has not means available to put order in
a part of its region, to provide personal security and security of the
property for all its citizens, to stop genocide in Kosova and to stop the
emigration of the Serbs from their century-long hearths. Such a position
indicates the discriminating policy towards Serbia, primarily if it is
taken into consideration that the Constitution of SFRY imposed internal
federalism as a permanent source of conflicts between the narrow Serbia
and its provinces.”
Published
by KIC (Kosova Information Center), ©Copyright KIC
|