| Document
2.
From the Archives of
Historic-Military Institute in Belgrade
MEMORANDUM
On the Present Situation of the Albanian Question and Its Development
“The Albanians live in a compact mass, that is scarcely inhabited
by Serbian population in the space from the Adriatic Sea to the old Serbian-Turkish
border. Even though the tribes living in this territory are strongly bound
among themselves, yet not only blood revenge but also hatred between Catholics
and Muslims exist. Nevertheless, immediately after the Congress of Berlin,
and especially due to the fact that Plava and Gucia were decided to be
handed over to Montenegro, the idea appeared of creation of greater Albania
which would include all the area between Montenegro of that time, Serbia,
Kaçanik and Greek kingdom (without the Vilayet of Salonika). This
idea sustained by official Turkey, put together all the patriot Albanians
soon, who initially had their club in Prizren. How powerful that idea was
may be best witnessed the fact that the Albanians in Gjakova killed Marshal
Pasha, who was sent by the Port to carry out the decision of the Congress
of Berlin to hand over Plava and Gucia to Montenegro. In agreement with
the Port, the Albanians in this way did not allow the will of the whole
Europe of that time to be accomplished, and Plava and Gucia remained further
in the structure of the Ottoman Empire, and to satisfy Montenegro, Europe
ordered the Ottoman state to hand over Tivar and Ulqin to it. Nevertheless,
to carry out this decision, the Float of all the participant countries
at the Congress of Berlin was planned to demonstrate along the Adriatic
coast...
The idea once born on greater Albania could not vanish. As Italy
and Austria intended to expand their influence in the Balkans, they sought
to adopt some authoritative personalities, and through them to carry out
(by money) their policy, disseminating in this way unconsciously the idea
of greater Albania, that found its powerful expression at continuous uprisings
of the Albanians in the last years of Turkish administration, and played
a great role in Turkish harassment.
By intervention of our military in 1912 and occupation of Kosova
and Metohia, the idea of greater Albania was given a mortal attack, but
the Albanian leadership, suported by Austria, managed to create their small
independent state, which played the role of Piedmont in the eyes of all
the Albanians. As Serbian population was in minority, and a large number
of Albanians had remained outside the borders of Albania, the political
borders fixed between Serbia and Albania did not have any importance for
the Albanians that were subjugated by us, who made their efforts to be
found within the structure of the Albanian state, and due to this Albanian
riots were raised immediately after the peace was made with Bulgaria.
The war between Serbia and Austria in 1924 gave full hope to all
the Albanians, who thought that time had come for their ideals to be accomplished.
But although greater Albanian was not formed, immediately after its arrival
at these regions Austria allowed the club of the Albanian nationalists,
whose centre was in Mitrovica, to develop greater agitation and strengthen
their influence. In the beginning, Lukë Lukaj, a Catholic, professor
from Shkodra, was president of the club, and later when he was interned,
Hasan Bey Vushtria played the most important role in it, whose desire to
become an Albanian ruler was supported by Austrian authorities, and his
ambitious wife, who was born in Salonika, encouraged him greately.
Owing to the proclaimed principle of nationality, the Albanians
were happy when our military came, as they thought that Europe would respect
that principle as well, and so they helped in turning out the Austrian
regime. But neither we nor Europe showed even the least readiness to respect
that principle of nationality, and although the Albanian leaders in Prizren
and Gjakova delivered a memorandum on the intentions of the Albanians to
French officials, we occupied those regions that had not belonged to us
on the basis of London Convention (Malësia, Has and Dibra), and the
Italians occupied whole Albania, so that the Albanians separated between
us and the Italians fell into a hard position and their leaders did not
know what to do for some time, that is proved by two Albanian delegations
represented at the Peace Conference in Paris. However, as soon as Albanian
nationalists formed their clubs in Shkodra and Durrës, their influence
was felt in our territory as well, especially in the part belonging to
Montenegro, as the Montenegrins and Albanians could not get along at all.
Since the influence of tribal chiefs is very great in Albania,
it is obvious that the will of the members of the clubs of Shkodra and
Durrës could easily be imposed and implemented by all the Albanians
in our territory, who acquired a conviction that if they rebelled in large
proportions, Europe would be forced to send them a commission to find out
the real situation. The best proof for this was the rebellion of the Albanians
of Plava and Gucia in February, the rebellion of Sadik Rama in May and
of Azem Bejta in the same year. The more the solution to the question of
the Albanians was prolonged, the more the idea for greater Albania grew
up. Our enemies, the Italians and Bulgarians, Austrians and Turks, sought
how to make use of the Albanian leaders, who sought support and aid from
all sides, but not from us, to get saved from the Serbs.
However, our internal hard position, due to unsolved political
circumstances, frequent replacements of officials and officers, weak means
of communication, the unjust and apathetic attitude towards administration,
and other reasons, influenced powerfully the creation of a terrain for
agitation against our administration, and the Montenegrins assisted very
much in this direction through their efforts to settle their own special
accounts with the Albanians. In addition, our foreign policy towards Albania
was not followed by some steady directive and there was no programme elaborated,
but every official felt himself obliged to accomplish a policy of his own.
They sent people from Belgrade, who did not have all the elements of the
Albanian question available, nor did they know sufficiently enough the
existing circumstances. There were even such persons who were delegated
to apply the Albanian policy only last year, and now were in Albania as
‘kaçaks' (major Bedri bey Mahmudbegoviq).
The proclamation of constitutional liberties and the discussion
of article 51 of the Peace Convention dealing with protection of minorities,
that was brought up in our newspapers, definitely formed the viewpoint
of the Albanians that they were a people who have all the rights to free
and equal life, but not also the right to their own state.
What was said above can be best seen in the present situation in
Kosova, Metohia and the region of Dibra, and I think one should not look
for other reasons, but I consider that it ought to be emphasised that there
is no political border between our Albanians and those in Albania. However,
since our interests can be seriously endangered by such attitudes of the
Albanians, I think that the idea of greater Albania could be paralysed
to some degree by taking these measures. I find it reasonable to emphasise
the following:
1) Opening a central office in Skopje (Shkup) for the accomplishment
of Albanian policy.
2) Taking a certain position to independent Albania. Our clear
declarations on the existence of an Albanian independent state, as well
as offering material aid to the present government, would be gladly accepted
by our Albanians and they could accept the lost of Malësia and Has.
The most natural politics is that Albania should request our support.
3) The Albanian leaders should be won over for our political intentions.
4) The rebellions should get interned.
5) Colonisation of Montenegrins in Metohia should take place and
our population get strengthened in those regions...”
16 June, 1920 Commander, honoured
adjutant
His Lordship, King Milosavljevic.
Published
by KIC (Kosova Information Center), ©Copyright KIC
|